ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Machine learning-based identification of anxiety symptoms in Chinese community-dwelling older adults: a comparative study of six algorithms with SHAP analysis and nomogram development.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anxiety disorders are common among older adults but remain underrecognized in community settings, particularly in China where mental health resources are scarce. This study aimed to develop and compare multiple machine learning models for identifying anxiety symptoms in Chinese community-dwelling older adults and to construct a practical clinical tool. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 5,331 community-dwelling older adults (aged ≥65 years) from Shenzhen, China. Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale, with a score ≥5 indicating clinically significant anxiety. Six machine learning algorithms-Lasso, Random Forest, XGBoost, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM)-were trained and compared. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed for model interpretability, and a nomogram was developed for clinical application. Results: The prevalence of anxiety symptoms was 11.3% (605/5,331). GBM achieved the highest AUC of 0.900 (sensitivity = 0.890, specificity = 0.762), comparable to XGBoost (AUC = 0.897) and Lasso (AUC = 0.893) with no significant differences (all P > 0.05). Feature combination analysis revealed that the "Psychological + Clinical" set achieved optimal performance (AUC = 0.903, PR-AUC = 0.617). SHAP analysis identified depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), insomnia (ISI), and loneliness (ULS-6) as the top three risk indicators. A nomogram incorporating nine predictors demonstrated good clinical utility. Conclusions: Machine learning models, particularly GBM, showed excellent performance in identifying anxiety symptoms among Chinese community-dwelling older adults. The model demonstrates promising internal validity but remains internally validated only; clinical implementation is premature without external validation in independent cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.