ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Three-Dimensional Perspective on Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate: Critical Conduction Abnormalities as Ablation Targets and Implications for Procedural Endpoints.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) is increasingly recognized as a three-dimensional (3D) arrhythmia sustained by complex reentrant circuits that frequently involve intramural components. Advances in high-density and high-resolution electroanatomical mapping have shifted the paradigm of substrate characterization from purely voltage-based structural definitions toward functional assessment of conduction delay and wavefront discontinuity. Recent studies have described techniques that target critical conduction abnormalities associated with VT circuits, including deceleration zones, lines of conduction block, and rotational activation patterns. A central concept underlying these approaches is that VT substrates are volumetric structures constrained by lateral and depth-oriented boundaries rather than planar pathways. Within this 3D framework, targeted ablation strategies that interrupt functionally relevant conduction abnormalities, rather than empirically modifying scar, have demonstrated clinical outcomes comparable to those of extensive homogenization approaches while potentially reducing procedural burden. Intramural reentry remains a major challenge because surface-based mapping incompletely captures mid-myocardial conduction, and current techniques for real-time intraprocedural assessment of intramural abnormalities remain limited. Adjunctive strategies, including differential pacing, refined annotation methods, and peak frequency analysis, may improve identification of critical substrate components, although no single parameter reliably defines the optimal ablation target. Accordingly, procedural endpoints should evolve beyond empirical surrogates such as VT termination or noninducibility toward confirmation of effective disruption of the 3D arrhythmogenic substrate. Continued integration of advanced mapping technologies, imaging, and lesion-delivery innovations will be essential to refine both ablation strategies and procedural endpoints in scar-related VT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.