Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694853›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026

A Machine Learning Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality in Postoperative Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection.

Ming-Hao Luo, Xian-Tong Cao, Yin-Rui Huang, Fei-Bai Yao, Guo-Wei Tu, Ying Su, Jun-Yi Hou, Yi-Jie Zhang, Chun-Sheng Wang, Hao Lai and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ming-Hao LuoCardiac Intensive Care Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200437 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-7883
Xian-Tong CaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710063 Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7070-9074
Yin-Rui HuangCardiac Intensive Care Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200437 Shanghai, China.
Fei-Bai YaoCardiac Intensive Care Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200437 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9066-398X
Guo-Wei TuCardiac Intensive Care Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200437 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-7631
Ying SuCardiac Intensive Care Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200437 Shanghai, China.
Jun-Yi HouCardiac Intensive Care Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200437 Shanghai, China.
Yi-Jie ZhangCardiac Intensive Care Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200437 Shanghai, China.
Chun-Sheng WangDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200437 Shanghai, China.
Hao LaiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200437 Shanghai, China.
Cong TianPhilips Research China, 201103 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3979-3745
Yana YuanPhilips Research China, 201103 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1559-9527
Tao ShiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 710063 Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Zhe LuoCardiac Intensive Care Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200437 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-1565

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds: Scoring systems are increasingly used for risk stratification in the postoperative management of type A aortic dissection (TAAD), but no consensus exists regarding the optimal tool. Thus, this study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based model to predict in-hospital mortality among postoperative patients with TAAD. Methods: Data from postoperative TAAD patients treated at two centers were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Clustering methods were implemented for feature selection. A random forest algorithm was selected from a range of machine learning methods to develop a postoperative mortality risk prediction tool. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to assess predictive accuracy and reliability. Model calibration was evaluated by plotting calibration curves. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were calculated to quantify the contribution of each feature. Model performance was compared with the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II). Results: A total of 983 patients who underwent surgical repair for TAAD were included in the study. Eight features were identified as significant predictors of in-hospital mortality. On postoperative day (POD) 1, the final random forest model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.8899 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7988-0.9469). External validation on POD 1 yielded an AUROC of 0.8331 (95% CI: 0.7722-0.8871). The model demonstrated significantly higher discriminative performance than EuroSCORE II. Conclusions: This study developed and primarily validated an accurate machine learning model to predict the all-cause in-hospital mortality of patients with TAAD undergoing surgical repair.

Indexed as

cardiac surgerymortalitymultiple organ failureperioperative medicinetype A aortic dissection

Identifiers

PMID42694853
PMCPMC13539989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.