ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
A Machine Learning Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality in Postoperative Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds: Scoring systems are increasingly used for risk stratification in the postoperative management of type A aortic dissection (TAAD), but no consensus exists regarding the optimal tool. Thus, this study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based model to predict in-hospital mortality among postoperative patients with TAAD. Methods: Data from postoperative TAAD patients treated at two centers were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Clustering methods were implemented for feature selection. A random forest algorithm was selected from a range of machine learning methods to develop a postoperative mortality risk prediction tool. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to assess predictive accuracy and reliability. Model calibration was evaluated by plotting calibration curves. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were calculated to quantify the contribution of each feature. Model performance was compared with the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II). Results: A total of 983 patients who underwent surgical repair for TAAD were included in the study. Eight features were identified as significant predictors of in-hospital mortality. On postoperative day (POD) 1, the final random forest model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.8899 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7988-0.9469). External validation on POD 1 yielded an AUROC of 0.8331 (95% CI: 0.7722-0.8871). The model demonstrated significantly higher discriminative performance than EuroSCORE II. Conclusions: This study developed and primarily validated an accurate machine learning model to predict the all-cause in-hospital mortality of patients with TAAD undergoing surgical repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.