ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Advances in Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia: Technical Considerations and Contemporary Approaches.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening arrhythmia that most commonly arises from reentrant circuits within myocardial scar in patients with structural heart disease. Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce sudden cardiac death, these devices do not prevent VT and are associated with significant physical and psychological burdens, while antiarrhythmic drug therapy is often limited by incomplete efficacy and adverse effects. These limitations have driven the increasing use of catheter ablation to target arrhythmogenic substrates. This review examines the evolving role of catheter ablation in VT management, including the supporting evidence, patient selection, procedural timing, and contemporary mapping and ablation strategies, drawing on data from randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and recent technological advances. Multiple trials, including SMASH-VT, VTACH, VANISH, SURVIVE-VT, and VANISH-2, have shown that catheter ablation reduces VT recurrence and ICD therapies, with growing evidence supporting the earlier or even first-line use of this technique in selected patients. Substrate-based ablation has become the cornerstone of modern practice, enabling effective treatment during sinus rhythm; meanwhile, preprocedural imaging, such as cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography, enhances scar characterization and procedural planning. Advanced approaches, including epicardial ablation, bipolar and needle ablation, and alternative energy delivery techniques, help overcome the limitations of conventional endocardial radiofrequency lesions. Emerging modalities, such as pulsed field ablation, show promise but require further validation. Despite these advances, VT-free survival remains approximately 50-60%, reflecting the complexity of the underlying arrhythmogenic substrates. Overall, catheter ablation has become an integral component of contemporary VT management, offering meaningful reductions in arrhythmia burden and ICD therapies, with increasing use earlier in the disease course; meanwhile, ongoing innovations in mapping, imaging integration, and energy delivery are expected to improve outcomes further, pending continued investigation into optimal patient selection, procedural timing, and long-term efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.