ArticleIndian journal of palliative care
Patient Experiences and Information Needs in Palliative Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
Article in Indian journal of palliative care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Palliative care aims to enhance the quality of life for patients facing terminal or life-threatening illnesses. Unfortunately, many patients encounter difficulties in understanding their condition, treatment processes and available care options due to limited access to clear and relevant information. This often leads to confusion, disrupted decision-making and increased anxiety. This study aimed to explore patient experiences and information needs in the context of palliative care. Materials and Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was employed, involving 20 participants, consisting of 10 palliative patients and 10 family members, to triangulate data sources. Participants were selected through purposive sampling based on predefined inclusion criteria. Data were collected through semi-structured face-to-face interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Five main themes with 10 subthemes were identified: (1) Sources of information about palliative care: information from physicians and nurses, information from family members and information from friends or community; (2) Alternative sources of health information included the internet (e.g., Google, websites) and educational videos on social media platforms (e.g., YouTube and TikTok); (3) Facilitators in accessing health information: Direct information provided by physicians and support from family members in obtaining information; (4) Barriers in understanding health information: difficulty understanding medical terminology and (5) Expectations for the Use of Digital Technology: easily accessible online health information and Digital applications or platforms for communication with healthcare professionals. Conclusion: Patient experiences in accessing palliative care information are shaped by interactions with doctors, family members and communities, while the internet and social media serve as additional sources. Most patients reported no difficulties due to the support of healthcare providers and their families. However, medical terminology created barriers to comprehension. Patients expressed strong expectations for hospitals to implement digital technologies to enhance access to information and continuity of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.