Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694804›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Carbon quantum dots in plant photosynthesis: from material design to agricultural performance.

Rishabh, Moushumi Ghosh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

RishabhTIET-TAU Center of Excellence for Food Security, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology Patiala Punjab-147004 India.
Moushumi GhoshDepartment of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology Patiala Punjab-147004 India mghosh@thapar.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1249-6827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable agricultural intensification requires nanomaterials that regulate plant physiology while improving resource-use efficiency and stress resilience. Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) have emerged as photosynthetic nano-regulators because their optical and electronic properties, surface functionality, dispersibility, and compositional flexibility enable control over plant uptake and activity. This review develops a structure-function-performance framework linking CQD physicochemical characteristics, including particle size, surface chemistry, optical properties, and heteroatom doping, with transport and photosynthetic regulation. Five interconnected mechanisms are identified: enhanced electron transport, improved light harvesting and spectral conversion, redox homeostasis and antioxidant regulation, chlorophyll biosynthesis and protection, and enhanced carbon fixation. Their evidentiary strength varies, with chloroplast-level evidence providing the strongest support for CQD-mediated electron-transport enhancement, whereas the other mechanisms are supported primarily by physiological, biochemical, photochemical, molecular, and transcriptomic observations. Multi-omics studies further indicate that CQD responses extend beyond photosynthesis into nutrient acquisition, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and stress adaptation. Reported applications include seed priming, photosynthetic enhancement, abiotic-stress mitigation, nutrient-use efficiency, and spectral-conversion strategies. However, limited long-term field validation, and uncertainties surrounding scalability, economic viability, environmental fate, and soil-climate dependence remain major barriers to agricultural translation. This review identifies mechanistic gaps and priorities for developing reproducible, environmentally responsible CQD technologies.

Identifiers

PMID42694804
PMCPMC13539731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.