Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694798›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2026

Development of the evidence-based guidelines for home birth in Switzerland: Results from a Delphi process.

Adrien Bruno, Piroska Zsindely, Rafaela Joos, Myrim Barbara Rösch, Carole Lüscher, Charlotte Farin-Moënnat, Claire Ajoubair, Anne Steiner

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of midwifery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adrien BrunoSchool of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Piroska ZsindelySchool of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Rafaela JoosAyor - ganzheitliche Hebammenpraxis, Rumlikon, Switzerland.
Myrim Barbara RöschHebammenpraxis Myrim and Team GmbH, Bern, Switzerland.
Carole LüscherHebammenpraxis 9punkt9 GmbH, Bern, Switzerland.
Charlotte Farin-MoënnatBirthing center 'Graines de Vie', Corsier-sur-Vevey, Switzerland.
Claire AjoubairBirthing center 'La Grange Rouge', Grens, Switzerland.
Anne SteinerQuality and Innovation, Swiss Federation of Midwives, Olten, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Switzerland, the right to a home birth is enshrined in law, and the associated costs are reimbursed by the national health insurance system. However, the conditions under which such births should occur remain unregulated at the national level, with no shared criteria for determining eligibility across the country. The aim of this project is to develop national guidelines to define criteria under which pregnant women would be ineligible for a planned home birth. A four-phase process was conducted, combining scientific evidence and expert consensus. It began with a systematic review of international home birth guidelines, conducted across five guideline specific databases and registries, complemented by a manual search. Subsequently, the identified criteria were submitted to expert classification by experienced Swiss home birth midwives through an online survey and three regional Delphi inspired workshops. Finally, the draft guideline was circulated to all members of the Swiss Federation of Midwives (SFM) for national consultation. The systematic search identified 262 records, of which 249 were screened and 42 assessed in full text. Nine guidelines met the inclusion criteria, from which 97 unique ineligibility criteria were extracted. Thirty Swiss clinical midwives participated in the classification phase, resulting in a four category structure distinguishing absolute ineligibility from situations requiring individual assessment. The national consultation generated 433 responses, leading to refinements and clarification of several criteria. The final guidelines comprise 97 criteria, supported by structured decision making pathways. These criteria include both medical conditions (e.g. unmanaged hypertensive disorders) and contextual factors requiring individual assessment (e.g. history of a previous baby >4500 g). This policy initiative has led to the first nationally endorsed home birth guidelines in Switzerland. Built on scientific evidence and clinical consensus, these guidelines provide a harmonized framework to support safety and professional autonomy in midwifery practice.

Indexed as

birth settinghome childbirthmidwiferypractice guidelines as a topicrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42694798
PMCPMC13539762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.