ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2026
Development of the evidence-based guidelines for home birth in Switzerland: Results from a Delphi process.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Switzerland, the right to a home birth is enshrined in law, and the associated costs are reimbursed by the national health insurance system. However, the conditions under which such births should occur remain unregulated at the national level, with no shared criteria for determining eligibility across the country. The aim of this project is to develop national guidelines to define criteria under which pregnant women would be ineligible for a planned home birth. A four-phase process was conducted, combining scientific evidence and expert consensus. It began with a systematic review of international home birth guidelines, conducted across five guideline specific databases and registries, complemented by a manual search. Subsequently, the identified criteria were submitted to expert classification by experienced Swiss home birth midwives through an online survey and three regional Delphi inspired workshops. Finally, the draft guideline was circulated to all members of the Swiss Federation of Midwives (SFM) for national consultation. The systematic search identified 262 records, of which 249 were screened and 42 assessed in full text. Nine guidelines met the inclusion criteria, from which 97 unique ineligibility criteria were extracted. Thirty Swiss clinical midwives participated in the classification phase, resulting in a four category structure distinguishing absolute ineligibility from situations requiring individual assessment. The national consultation generated 433 responses, leading to refinements and clarification of several criteria. The final guidelines comprise 97 criteria, supported by structured decision making pathways. These criteria include both medical conditions (e.g. unmanaged hypertensive disorders) and contextual factors requiring individual assessment (e.g. history of a previous baby >4500 g). This policy initiative has led to the first nationally endorsed home birth guidelines in Switzerland. Built on scientific evidence and clinical consensus, these guidelines provide a harmonized framework to support safety and professional autonomy in midwifery practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.