ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Post-traumatic meningioma or coincidental occurrence? A case report and critical review of the literature.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The possible causal relationship between traumatic brain injury and subsequent meningioma development remains controversial. Although historical and anecdotal reports have suggested a post-traumatic origin of meningiomas, robust epidemiological evidence is lacking, and the distinction between causality and coincidence remains challenging. Case Description: We report the case of a 78-year-old man who sustained a severe frontal cranial trauma with a comminuted fracture and retained foreign body 40 years earlier, treated surgically by craniectomy. Decades later, the patient presented with a headache and cognitive disturbance. Neuroimaging revealed a frontal meningioma arising beneath and within the previous craniectomy site. The tumor was successfully removed en bloc through navigated craniectomy, followed by dural reconstruction and cranioplasty. Histopathological examination confirmed a benign meningioma. The postoperative course was uneventful, and follow-up imaging showed no recurrence. Conclusion: Rather than supporting a traumatic origin of meningioma, this case underscores the limitations in attributing causality between head trauma and tumor development. It emphasizes the need for cautious interpretation of post-traumatic tumor cases and provides clinically relevant insights into the evaluation of meningioma etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.