Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694743›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Comparison of Oral Health Features in a Pair of Identical Twins: A Case Report.

Mohammed Awawdeha, Khalid Alfayez, Abdullah Alshetan, Ahmed Al-Askar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed AwawdehaDepartment of Preventive Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Khalid AlfayezCollege of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdullah AlshetanCollege of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh, SAU.
Ahmed Al-AskarCollege of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case report presents the overall oral health characteristics of 23-year-old identical male twins. It compares their oral features, including restorative status (i.e., decayed, missing, and filled teeth), periodontal and orthodontic characteristics, and facial characteristics. Clinical and radiographic examinations were used to assess and document these features. Despite the expected similarities in many oral characteristics, notable differences were observed in oral health status, including the presence of dental caries, filled teeth, and the condition of the wisdom teeth. Additionally, variations were identified in the twins' facial and orthodontic characteristics. This case report aims to establish a standardized protocol for quantifying oral features in future clinical studies involving identical twins in dentistry. By highlighting both the similarities and differences between the twins, this report provides a foundation for future research to clarify the respective contributions of genetic and environmental factors to overall oral and facial characteristics in the population.

Indexed as

aichatgptdental similarities among twinsoral featuresoral health features among twinsorthodonticsperiodontal features among twinrestorative features among twinsimilarities and differences among twinstwins

Identifiers

PMID42694743
PMCPMC13539520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.