SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2026
Blockchain-enabled digital twin systems in healthcare: a systematic scoping review of architectural integration, privacy, governance, ethical challenges, and regulatory solutions under GDPR and HIPAA.
Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: The integration of blockchain and digital twin (DT) technologies is increasingly recognised as a promising approach for improving healthcare data integrity, interoperability, privacy, and clinical decision support. While digital twins enable dynamic patient modelling and predictive healthcare applications, blockchain provides secure data governance through decentralised trust, auditability, and access control. However, existing research remains fragmented, with limited synthesis of the architectural integration, regulatory readiness, ethical governance, and interoperability of blockchain-enabled healthcare digital twin systems. This systematic scoping review addresses these gaps by providing a comprehensive architectural and compliance-oriented analysis of the current evidence. Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines using Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. From 148 identified records, 55 eligible studies published between 2020 and 2025 were included after duplicate removal and eligibility screening. Data were extracted on digital twin functionality, blockchain architecture, healthcare application domains, consensus mechanisms, privacy-preserving strategies, and regulatory and ethical alignment. Structured Python-based visual mapping and comparative analyses were performed to identify architectural, governance, and compliance patterns across the literature. Results: The findings demonstrate that blockchain is predominantly employed to provide access control, audit logging, data integrity, consent management, and secure data provenance within healthcare digital twin ecosystems. Patient-level and EHR-centred digital twins represented the most mature application areas, whereas cross-domain and infrastructure-level frameworks dominated early architectural exploration. The review identifies recurring compliance-oriented architectural patterns while revealing substantial gaps in clinically validated deployments, interoperability with established healthcare standards, decentralised governance models, and formal implementation of GDPR- and HIPAA-compliant engineering practices. Comparative heatmap analyses further highlight the uneven maturity of ethical governance and regulatory integration across blockchain functionalities. Conclusion: This review provides the first comprehensive compliance-oriented architectural synthesis of blockchain-enabled healthcare digital twin systems by integrating technical architecture, regulatory readiness, ethical governance, and privacy-preserving design patterns within a unified analytical framework. The proposed architectural mapping identifies critical research gaps in interoperability, governance engineering, consensus optimisation, and real-world clinical validation, providing a foundation for the development of trustworthy, GDPR/HIPAA-aligned, FHIR-compatible, and clinically interoperable healthcare digital twin ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.