ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Assessment of oral health, salivary alterations, and parental KAP in children with congenital heart disease.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at high risk for infective endocarditis (IE), with poor oral health being a key portal for bacteraemia. Data holistically integrating clinical status, salivary defence mechanisms, and parental behaviors in this vulnerable population are scarce. Aim: To compare the oral health status, salivary parameters, Materials and methods: This cross-sectional comparative study enrolled 65 children with IE-risk CHD and 65 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (aged 3-12 years). Assessments included the DMFT/deft and Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S). Unstimulated saliva was analyzed for flow rate, pH, buffering capacity, viscosity, osmolality, and secretory IgA. Results: The CHD group had significantly higher mean DMFT (4.2 ± 2.1 vs. 1.8 ± 1.5; p < 0.001) and OHI-S scores (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.5; p < 0.001). They exhibited compromised salivary function (reduced flow, pH, buffering, sIgA; p < 0.05) and elevated pathogenic markers (viscosity, osmolality, Conclusion: Children with CHD exhibit a deleterious triad of severe caries, dysfunctional salivary defences, and inadequate parental preventive practices. These findings mandate the integration of point-of-care oral screening and structured parent education into routine cardiac follow-up to mitigate IE risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.