ArticleCureus2026
Suspected Congenital Absence of the Vermiform Appendix in a 13-Year-Old Girl: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A congenital absence of the vermiform appendix (appendiceal agenesis) is a rare anatomical anomaly that is mostly recognised incidentally upon exploratory surgery due to suspected appendicitis. Preoperative diagnosis is difficult since symptoms and imaging studies typically resemble other causes of right lower quadrant pain. In this report, we describe an adolescent girl aged 13 who presented with right lower quadrant abdominal pain; this led to a workup to rule out acute appendicitis. Imaging studies were performed to evaluate the cause of her pain. An ultrasound examination of the abdomen demonstrated an enlarged left ovary (bulky), and a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen/pelvis confirmed that there was a left ovarian cyst (3-4 cm in diameter) along with a partially calcified lesion involving the left adnexa and that the ileocaecal region appeared to be normal. Conservative treatment was not completely effective in eliminating the symptoms. Thus, surgical exploration was decided. During the operation, a small amount of reactive liquid was found in the ileocaecal area. A comprehensive and careful search of the ileocecum, followed by tracing of the taenia coli, did not reveal the presence of a vermiform appendix, and only a small 1 cm nodular structure was found at the end of the taenia coli. Congenital hypoplasia of the appendix was strongly suspected based on intraoperative findings, and hence, abdominal closure was performed without further complications. The postoperative course was uneventful. The case demonstrates how difficult it can be to diagnose appendicitis when clinical findings and imaging studies present ambiguity in diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.