ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Procedural Characteristics of Eccentric Versus Circumferential Pericardial Effusions in a Symptomatic Drainage Cohort.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eccentric pericardial effusions are non-circumferential fluid collections that may complicate conventional pericardiocentesis, yet the associated clinical characteristics remain poorly defined. Methods: This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study included adult patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion of undetermined etiology who underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis under transthoracic echocardiographic or fluoroscopic guidance or a surgical pericardial window procedure. Based on preprocedural multi-view transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), effusions were classified as eccentric or circumferential. Baseline characteristics, imaging features, procedural outcomes, pericardial fluid analyses, etiologies, and short-term outcomes were compared. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with eccentric distribution. Results: Among 156 patients, 47 (30.1%) had eccentric pericardial effusions. In multivariable analysis, a chronic course (odds ratio (OR) 6.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.68-14.85; Conclusions: In this symptomatic drainage cohort, eccentric pericardial effusions were associated with a chronic course and higher body temperature and were characterized by left ventricular lateral predominance, fewer classic echocardiographic signs of tamponade, and greater reliance on fluoroscopic guidance for drainage. The etiologic spectrum of eccentric effusions was more heterogeneous and less likely to be malignant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.