ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Physical Activity in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: From Trigger to Therapeutic Dilemma.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is highly sensitive to environmental influences, with physical exercise emerging as one of the most important determinants of disease expression. Growing evidence indicates that high-intensity and endurance exercise accelerate structural remodelling, promote inflammatory myocardial injury, and increase the incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in genetically predisposed individuals. These effects extend beyond acute exertion, as cumulative exercise exposure contributes to the development of a persistent arrhythmogenic substrate that may sustain risk even after cessation of competitive sport. In contrast, available data suggest that low-intensity physical activity does not confer the same degree of arrhythmic burden and may support overall cardiovascular and functional health when carefully prescribed. This review integrates mechanistic insights, clinical cohort data, and current guideline recommendations to provide a balanced framework for exercise counselling in ACM. Rather than advocating complete physical inactivity, this approach differentiates high-risk endurance or competitive exercise from carefully selected low-intensity recreational activity and emphasizes individualized, shared decision-making. Thus, understanding the interaction among genetic substrate, exercise intensity, and systemic stressors is essential for optimizing personalized activity recommendations and improving long-term outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.