Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694519›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology

Biomarker-guided selection of intravesical therapy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A contemporary review.

Willian Ito, Isamu Tachibana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Willian ItoDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
Isamu TachibanaDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0950-1296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer poses therapeutic challenges, with significant rates of recurrence and progression with standard intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. Current surveillance strategies lack accurate risk stratification models to predict individual treatment response and personalized treatment options. Simultaneously, there are no well-validated alternatives to replace the current gold-standard approach based on clinical and pathologic features. This review examines emerging biomarkers and advanced technologies with the potential to enhance patient selection and personalize intravesical therapy in HR-NMIBC. Artificial intelligence(AI)-driven histopathologic tools, such as the computer histological AI biomarker, have demonstrated the ability to identify non-responders to standard therapy using whole-slide digital pathology images. In parallel, radiomics-enhanced imaging has shown promise in assessing tumor biology and immune microenvironment features predictive of BCG responsiveness. Liquid biopsy, especially urine tumor DNA analysis, is now available in the arsenal to detect minimal residual disease, stratify recurrence risk, and predict treatment response even before clinical or radiographic evidence of recurrence. Tissue-based genomic profiling has also revealed molecular alterations associated with treatment resistance, though additional validation is needed. Together, these next-generation biomarkers may represent a pivotal shift toward precision oncology in bladder cancer and their incorporation into NMIBC future clinical guidelines is both anticipated and necessary.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceBCG-unresponsive diseasebiomarkersliquid biopsynon–muscle invasive bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID42694519
PMCPMC13539006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.