Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694505›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in ophthalmology2025

The application of ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of orbital lesions.

Bernadete Ayres, Hakan Demirci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bernadete AyresDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Hakan DemirciDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The imaging studies play an important role in the diagnosis and management of orbital lesions. This article provides a comprehensive overview of ultrasonographic imaging features and its practical application in the evaluation of orbital lesions. In this article, we review the features of common orbital lesions using ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging correlation. The topics will include tumors, inflammatory diseases, congenital malformations, and orbital trauma. Each condition is reviewed in relation to its clinical presentation and imaging characteristics.

Indexed as

diagnosisimaginginflammatory diseasesorbittumorsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42694505
PMCPMC13539507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.