Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694467›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026

From Biomedical Datasets to Fairness-Aware Recommendations: An Integrated Data Orchestration Pipeline for Binary Clinical Predictions.

Marta Alberola, Pedro Copado, Alfredo Vellido, Caroline König

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marta AlberolaIntelligent Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (IDEAI-UPC) Research Centre, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - Barcelona Tech (UPC), Barcelona 08034, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0278-2018
Pedro CopadoIntelligent Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (IDEAI-UPC) Research Centre, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - Barcelona Tech (UPC), Barcelona 08034, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4219-5056
Alfredo VellidoIntelligent Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (IDEAI-UPC) Research Centre, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - Barcelona Tech (UPC), Barcelona 08034, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9843-1911
Caroline KönigIntelligent Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (IDEAI-UPC) Research Centre, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - Barcelona Tech (UPC), Barcelona 08034, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-8686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many problems in biomedicine can be posed as binary classification. When they are addressed using artificial intelligence methods, though, average performance alone does not show whether a dataset is artificial intelligence ready, whether the endpoint is clinically valid, or whether errors are unevenly distributed across patient subgroups. This article presents the Fairness-Aware Data Orchestration Pipeline (FADOP), a reusable workflow that analyzes biomedical datasets, trains baseline binary classifiers, audits subgroup error patterns, tests mitigation strategies, and generates a documented recommendation. Such a pipeline is intended for systematic evaluation before clinical translation, not as an automatic deployment tool. Two publicly available case studies illustrate its use: the HIV-related ACTG175 dataset was repurposed from a treatment-comparison trial into a 1-year baseline mortality-prediction task, with death by day 365 as the positive class rather than the cid AIDS/failure composite endpoint; then, a stroke-risk dataset was analyzed as direct event prediction. The case studies show how the same workflow can generate cohort, performance, fairness, mitigation, and recommendation evidence across different rare-event clinical datasets.

Identifiers

PMID42694467
PMCPMC13538956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.