ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Geometric mechanogenomics: engineering boundary conditions for deterministic cell fate control.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In tissue development and regeneration, cellular behavior has traditionally been interpreted through biochemical signaling frameworks. However, cells exist within physically defined environments, where geometric boundary conditions - including confinement, curvature, anisotropy, and multicellular architecture - define the mechanical state space in which mechanical forces are generated, transmitted, and interpreted. Here, we introduce geometric mechanogenomics, a conceptual framework that positions geometry as an upstream spatial regulator linking tissue-scale boundary conditions to nuclear mechanics, chromatin organization, and genome regulation. We propose a boundary-to-nucleus axis through which geometric information is decoded by adhesion-mediated mechanotransduction, cytoskeletal force transmission, and nuclear mechanoregulation to regulate chromatin accessibility, epigenetic remodeling, and transcriptional programs. Rather than introducing new mechanotransduction pathways, this framework emphasizes that geometry spatially organizes conserved mechanotransductive machinery to generate context-dependent mechanogenomic outcomes. We further discuss how engineered geometries reduce morphogenetic stochasticity, coordinate multicellular organization, and establish mechanical memory that influences long-term cell fate. Finally, we highlight current challenges in establishing predictive geometry-to-genome relationships and discuss emerging opportunities enabled by spatial omics, artificial intelligence-assisted inverse design, and dynamic biomaterials for programmable mechanobiology, regenerative medicine, developmental biology, and disease modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.