Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694463›Full record

ArticlemicroPublication biology2026

Hover Fly Eyes and Antennae Are Sexually Dimorphic but Do Not Tradeoff.

George J Todd, Aimee S Dunlap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in microPublication biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George J ToddBiology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St Louis, MO, United States.
Aimee S DunlapBiology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory systems are energetically expensive and may evolve through tradeoffs between modalities. We tested the sensory tradeoff hypothesis in four hover fly species by examining allometry and sexual dimorphism in eye and antennal (funiculus) size. Across species, larger flies exhibited larger sensory structures and males generally possessed relatively larger eyes and funiculi than females after controlling for body size. However, we found no consistent negative relationship between eye and antennal investment within species. These findings suggest that sensory investment in hover flies is shaped more strongly by allometric and sex-specific selection pressures than by compensatory tradeoffs between sensory modalities.

Identifiers

PMID42694463
PMCPMC13539386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.