Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694431›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026

The gut reservoir of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: from dysbiosis and colonization to infection and decolonization, with a focus on patients with hematologic malignancies - a narrative review.

Lorenza Putignani, Riccardo Marsiglia, Luigia Turco, Antonio Russo, Stefania Pane, Alessandra Fusco, Loris Lopetuso, Enrico Maria Trecarichi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lorenza PutignaniUnit of Microbiome, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Riccardo MarsigliaUnit of Microbiome, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Luigia TurcoUnit of Microbiome, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Antonio RussoDepartment of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy.
Stefania PaneUnit of Microbiomics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Alessandra FuscoDepartment of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy.
Loris LopetusoDepartment of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy.
Enrico Maria TrecarichiDepartment of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) remain among the highest-priority antimicrobial-resistant pathogens worldwide, and intestinal colonization is increasingly recognized as the key precursor of invasive infections, particularly in patients with hematological malignancies. Increasing evidence indicates that disruption of the gut microbial ecosystem, reflected in reduced diversity, depletion of beneficial anaerobic taxa, intestinal barrier dysfunction, immune dysregulation, and expansion of Enterobacterales, plays a central role in the transition from colonization to infection. Consequently, restoring colonization resistance through microbiome-targeted interventions has emerged as a promising preventive strategy. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence on the epidemiology and clinical impact of CRE colonization and infection, with particular emphasis on the ecological alterations of the gut microbiome linking gut dysbiosis to epithelial barrier dysfunction, immune dysregulation, and loss of colonization resistance to CRE persistence and invasive infection. We critically discuss both conventional and emerging decolonization approaches, including selective digestive decontamination, probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), bacteriophage therapy, and CRISPR-Cas-based technologies, highlighting their mechanisms of action, available clinical evidence, and current limitations. Particular attention is given to patients with hematological malignancies, in whom the clinical need for effective decolonization strategies is greatest. Although FMT currently represents the most promising microbiome-based intervention, the available evidence remains heterogeneous and largely derived from small studies. Overall, durable and standardized decolonization strategies have yet to be established, underscoring the need for well-designed multicenter randomized clinical trials to define effective microbiome-directed approaches for preventing CRE-related infections in high-risk populations.

Indexed as

Carbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeDysbiosisEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHematologic NeoplasmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansProbioticsAnti-Bacterial Agentscarbapenem-resistant Enterobacteralescolonization resistancefecal microbiota transplantationhematologic patientsmicrobiota-based decolonization strategies

Identifiers

PMID42694431
PMCPMC13539311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.