ReviewHealth science reports2026
Academic Performance Among Children With Sickle Cell Disease in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Aim: Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face significant disease-related challenges and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities that may negatively impact their academic performance. This systematic review synthesized existing evidence on academic performance among children with SCD in LMICs. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, and SCOPUS (January 1980-July 2026) using controlled vocabulary and free-text terms related to SCD and academic performance. We included cross-sectional studies and one prospective study involving children under 18 years with SCD in LMICs. Eligible studies reported on academic performance outcomes across two measures: academic achievement and grade attainment. Comparator groups were children without SCD. Studies outside LMICs and in languages other than English were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The review was conducted and reported following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Owing to the heterogeneity of assessment measures, a meta-analysis could not be undertaken. Findings were synthesized narratively using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis approach. Results: Of 165 records screened, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 1630 participants. Seven of the 11 studies meeting the inclusion criteria had reported poorer academic performance among children with SCD compared to healthy peers, siblings, relatives, or neighborhood controls. Findings varied according to the academic performance measures and analytic approaches employed across studies. Several studies reported poorer academic performance and higher rates of grade repetition among children with SCD compared to controls. Older age and school absenteeism were among the factors most commonly associated with poorer academic outcomes. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that children with SCD in LMICs may be at increased risk of academic difficulties. Particular attention may be needed for older children with SCD and those with frequent school absenteeism. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022200619.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.