ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
AI-driven ANN-PSO smart-inverter capacity allocation at preselected buses under meteorological uncertainty.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radial distribution grids require renewable planning methods that jointly account for meteorological generation, WT/PV capacity allocation, and smart-inverter voltage support. Methods: An ANN-PSO-VoltVAR framework was developed using 2012-2021 NASA POWER irradiance, wind-speed, and temperature data for In Salah, Algeria. Renewable uncertainty was represented by 12 stratified Weibull-Beta scenarios and an expected-cost/CVaR objective. The mixed decision vector optimized WT units, PV strings, and voltage-dependent inverter support at four preselected IEEE 85-bus locations. An exact backward/forward-sweep module on the standard 33-bus feeder independently verified the load-flow implementation. Results: The tuned ANN achieved an RMSE of 1.6323 kW, an MAE of 1.2314 kW, and an R-squared value of 0.99999. The verified five-start mean-profile solution reduced mean active loss to 15.9900 kW and voltage deviation to 0.051082 p.u., while increasing minimum voltage to 0.98213 p.u. and minimum VSI to 0.96307. Relative to IFLO, the respective improvements were 54.57%, 22.49%, 1.21%, and 8.41%. Discussion: The ablation analysis showed that capacity sizing accounted for most of the loss reduction, whereas Volt-VAR support produced the clearer additional voltage-security gains. Because the IEEE 85-bus electrical response is benchmark-calibrated rather than fully reconstructed, the findings should be interpreted as a reproducible proof-of-concept. Direct full-feeder validation on the IEEE 85-bus system and other networks remains necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.