ArticlePalliative medicine reports
A Qualitative Study of the Initial Diagnosis and Treatment Experience of Black Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Palliative medicine reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Black patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience disparate outcomes, and factors such as structural racism and differential treatment access have been implicated. We sought to understand the experience of Black patients with newly diagnosed AML to gain insight into their unique experience. Methods: We interviewed Black patients ≥18 years of age with newly diagnosed AML (diagnosed from 7/1/2021 to 7/31/2022) over Zoom. Interviews were conducted by the same interviewer, with concordance in race between the interviewer and interviewees. A rapid qualitative content analysis was employed. Results: Ten patients were interviewed, with a median age of 63.5 years (range, 36-82 years). Six were male, married, and treated with a hypomethylating agent. Seven patients had secondary AML. Themes were broadly categorized under (1) the diagnosis and treatment experience, (2) challenges that arose, and (3) coping strategies. Unique findings included the experience of bias during the initial diagnosis period (but not during treatment decision-making discussions), and the overwhelming role of faith/religion/spirituality in coping. Other notable themes included trust, shock and urgent decision making, diverse support systems, physical limitations, the psychological impact, and financial constraints. Conclusions: Interviewed Black patients with newly diagnosed AML reported bias in the initial diagnosis period, possibly racially motivated, but did not feel this was at play in treatment discussions. The importance of faith/religion/spirituality in coping was also highlighted. Interventions focused on implicit bias training and supporting spiritual needs are critical to improve the experience of Black patients with AML and provide equitable care to all patients with AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.