ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Coagulation dysfunction in term neonatal sepsis: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To characterize clinical features, conventional coagulation profiles, and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters in term neonates with sepsis, and to evaluate their associations with all-cause mortality within 28 days after sepsis diagnosis, with particular emphasis on whether a fibrin-based ROTEM parameter provides incremental prognostic information beyond organ dysfunction severity and conventional coagulation testing. Methods: This prospective hospital-based cohort study was conducted at the Neonatal Center of Vietnam National Children's Hospital between June 2024 and December 2025. Term neonates (gestational age 37-42 weeks) diagnosed with neonatal sepsis according to the European Medicines Agency 2010 criteria were enrolled. Clinical severity was assessed using the neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (nSOFA) score. Conventional coagulation tests included platelet count, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (INR), aPTT ratio, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and selected natural anticoagulants. Viscoelastic coagulation was evaluated using ROTEM (INTEM, EXTEM, and FIBTEM assays). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 28 days after sepsis diagnosis. Associations between clinical, laboratory, and ROTEM parameters and mortality were examined using univariable analyses and prespecified multivariable logistic regression models. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 168 term neonates with sepsis were included, of whom 23 died within 28 days (mortality rate, 13.7%). Non-survivors had significantly higher nSOFA scores at diagnosis than survivors (median 12 vs. 6; Conclusion: Among term neonates with sepsis, early organ dysfunction severity assessed by nSOFA was the strongest determinant of short-term mortality. Non-survivors exhibited a consistent hypocoagulable phenotype characterized by prolonged conventional coagulation times, reduced clot strength, and impaired clot propagation on ROTEM. Although FIBTEM maximum clot firmness reflected disease severity and showed a clinically meaningful association with mortality, its incremental prognostic value beyond nSOFA and conventional coagulation measures was limited. ROTEM may therefore be most useful as a complementary tool for hemostatic phenotyping and assessment of coagulation dysfunction rather than as a stand-alone mortality prediction instrument. Larger multicenter studies incorporating serial viscoelastic assessments are warranted to further define its prognostic and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.