Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694312›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Beware of Radiological Diagnosis of Pancreatic Pseudocyst: Lesson Learned From an Interesting Case.

Nanthesh Kumaran S, Sankar S, Chinni Vikram

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nanthesh Kumaran SSurgical Gastroenterology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Sankar SSurgical Gastroenterology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Chinni VikramSurgical Gastroenterology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic pseudocysts are the most common cystic lesions of the pancreas; however, several cystic neoplasms may closely mimic their radiological appearance. Misdiagnosis may result in inappropriate drainage procedures and delayed definitive treatment. A case of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) that was repeatedly diagnosed as a pancreatic pseudocyst before definitive surgical management is presented. A 40-year-old woman with a history of acute pancreatitis presented with recurrent upper abdominal pain and a large pancreatic cystic lesion initially diagnosed as a pancreatic pseudocyst. She underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with pancreatic duct stenting followed by cystogastrostomy. Despite these interventions, the lesion persisted. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, demonstrated a large cystic lesion in the body and tail of the pancreas with enhancing internal septations, raising suspicion for a cystic neoplasm. The patient subsequently underwent an open distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy. Histopathological examination revealed an MCN characterized by mucin-producing columnar epithelium and ovarian-type stroma, confirming the diagnosis. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges in differentiating pancreatic pseudocysts from MCNs based on imaging alone. Persistent or recurrent cystic lesions, particularly in middle-aged women and those demonstrating enhancing internal septations, should prompt reconsideration of the diagnosis and further evaluation to facilitate timely surgical management.

Indexed as

cystogastrostomydifferential diagnosismucinous cystic neoplasmpancreatic pseudocystpancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID42694312
PMCPMC13538278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.