ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2026
Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using a Standard Suture Anchor Is Safe and Effective.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an arthroscopic technique of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis using a standard absorbable double-loaded suture anchor. Methods: This retrospective study includes all patients who underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis by the senior author between December 2017 and June 2020. Biceps tenodesis was performed in patients who had failed conservative management and exhibited evidence of biceps pathology at the time of surgery that appeared to be contributing to the patient's pain. Evaluation criteria included integrity of the repair by physical examination, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale for pain, and recording any complications and the need for revision surgery. Results: A total of 80/96 patients (83%) were available for evaluation at a minimum of 2 years including 43 men and 37 women with an average age of 53 (range 17-72). Postoperatively, the average in-office follow-up was 17 months (range 1.5-79 months), and the average phone contact follow-up was 55 months (range 24-89 months). Ninety-one percent (73/80) of patients in this series maintained normal biceps contour. The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 41 (range: 0-82) to an average of 83 (range 18-100) ( Conclusions: Arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis using a standard suture anchor is safe and effective in the management of symptomatic biceps pathology refractory to conservative management. It offers reliable improvements in pain and function while maintaining biceps contour. It has a low complication rate, avoiding many of the potential complications reported after an open approach. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective therapeutic study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.