Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694290›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

A lightweight deep learning framework for tea cultivar identification based on leaf images.

Menghan He, Guanjun Chen, Jianzhao Wang, Dandan Tang, Qinling Liu, Xiong Xiong, Liqiang Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Menghan HeTea Resources Utilization and Quality Testing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Guanjun ChenTea Resources Utilization and Quality Testing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Jianzhao WangTea Resources Utilization and Quality Testing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Dandan TangTea Resources Utilization and Quality Testing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Qinling LiuTea Resources Utilization and Quality Testing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xiong XiongCollege of Information Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yucheng District, Ya'an, China.
Liqiang TanTea Resources Utilization and Quality Testing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate tea cultivar identification is a long-standing challenge in tea plant propagation and cultivation. Traditional cultivar identification based on morphological observation relies heavily on expert experience, leading to strong subjectivity; while DNA fingerprinting-based approaches are time-consuming and costly, restricting their large-scale application. This study attempts to construct a deep learning- based on leaf morphological and visual characteristics. We collected an original dataset comprising 11,404 leaf images from 10 clonal tea cultivars for model development and evaluation. Comparative experiments were conducted using five models: ResNet50, EfficientNet-B3, MobileNetV3-large, ViT-B16, and ConvNeXt-Tiny. ResNet50 achieved the highest classification accuracy, whereas MobileNetV3-Large provided a better balance between accuracy and computational efficiency and was therefore selected as the baseline model for lightweight optimization. Channel pruning and PTDQ were further applied to compress and optimize MobileNetV3-Large, resulting in a lightweight and efficient tea cultivar identification model. The optimized model achieved a test accuracy of 97.15% on the independent testing set, while reducing the model size from 34.40 MB to 7.67 MB and decreasing inference latency from 42.35 ms to 27.67 ms. Future work will focus on integration into Android-based field applications. This study provides an efficient lightweight solution for practical tea cultivar identification and mobile deployment.

Indexed as

cultivar identificationdeep learningleaf image analysistea cultivar identificationtea plant cultivars

Identifiers

PMID42694290
PMCPMC13538894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.