Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694286›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Role of ECMO and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in the management of acute pulmonary embolism.

Mark G Davies, Joseph P Hart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark G DaviesCenter for Quality, Effectiveness, and Outcomes in Cardiovascular Diseases, Houston, TX, United States.
Joseph P HartCenter for Quality, Effectiveness, and Outcomes in Cardiovascular Diseases, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional treatment for hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism (PE) is now common due to the fact that unstable PE carries a significant 30-day mortality. Unstable PE is characterized by acute right ventricular failure, hypotension, and hypoxia, leading to cardiovascular collapse and cardiac arrest. Implementation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) acutely provides oxygenation support to improve hypoxia and offload the right ventricular (RV) pressure in the belief that rapid reduction of hypoxia and right ventricular (RV) pressure will provide a window for intervention. There are two strategies for using VA-ECMO during percutaneous pulmonary mechanical thrombectomy: VA-ECMO-assisted mechanical thrombectomy and mechanical thrombectomy with standby VA-ECMO. While the application of VA-ECMO in percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy is usually short-term, providers must be cognizant that it can be associated with substantial multisystem morbidity due to a systemic inflammatory response, hemorrhagic stroke, renal dysfunction, and bleeding, and these factors will impact outcomes. The evolving paradigm positions VA-ECMO combined with percutaneous pulmonary mechanical thrombectomy as the preferred combination for the high-risk PE patients (acute right ventricular failure, refractory shock, and cardiac arrest), while percutaneous pulmonary mechanical thrombectomy alone with standby VA-ECMO suffices for most intermediate PE patients.

Indexed as

ECMOinterventionoutcomespercutaneous mechanical therapypulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID42694286
PMCPMC13538984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.