Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694230›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2026

Anti-PAR2 autoantibodies are associated with chronic histological injury in kidney transplant recipients.

Karolina Marek-Bukowiec, Jakub Mizera, Harald Heidecke, Kai Schulze-Forster, Łucja Janek, Ignacy Tarski, Mateusz Minor, Guido Moll, Rusan Ali Catar, Patryk Jerzak and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Karolina Marek-BukowiecDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantation Medicine and Internal Diseases, Institute of Internal Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Jakub MizeraDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantation Medicine and Internal Diseases, Institute of Internal Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Harald HeideckeCellTrend GmbH, Luckenwalde, Germany.
Kai Schulze-ForsterCellTrend GmbH, Luckenwalde, Germany.
Łucja JanekStatistical Analysis Centre, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Ignacy TarskiDivision of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Mateusz MinorDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantation Medicine and Internal Diseases, Institute of Internal Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Guido MollBerlin Institute of Health (BIH) Center and School for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT/BSRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Rusan Ali CatarDepartment of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Patryk JerzakDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantation Medicine and Internal Diseases, Institute of Internal Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Magdalena Kuriata-KordekDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantation Medicine and Internal Diseases, Institute of Internal Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Piotr DonizyDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Agnieszka HałońDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Krzysztof KujawaStatistical Analysis Centre, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Dariusz JanczakDepartment of Vascular, General, and Transplant Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Mirosław BanasikDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantation Medicine and Internal Diseases, Institute of Internal Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Non-HLA autoantibodies directed against G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have emerged as potential contributors to endothelial activation, vascular injury, rejection, and chronic allograft dysfunction after kidney transplantation. Protease-activated receptors 1 and 2 (PAR1 and PAR2) are GPCRs located at the interface of coagulation, inflammation, endothelial signaling, and tissue remodeling. However, the clinical relevance of circulating anti-PAR1 and anti-PAR2 autoantibodies in kidney transplant recipients remains undetermined. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study including 123 kidney transplant recipients who underwent clinically indicated allograft biopsy between 2018 and 2025. The primary objective was to evaluate associations between serum anti-PAR1 and anti-PAR2 autoantibody concentrations and the severity of Banff histopathological lesions. Associations with rejection phenotypes, selected clinical variables, and graft outcomes were also evaluated. Antibody concentrations were measured by ELISA. Correlation analyses, non-parametric group comparisons, logistic regression models, and exploratory landmark analyses of death-censored graft survival from serum sampling were performed. Correction for multiple testing was applied using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate procedure. Results: Anti-PAR2 concentrations showed weak but statistically significant associations with interstitial fibrosis (Kendall τ = 0.221, pFDR = 0.005), tubular atrophy (Kendall τ = 0.216, pFDR = 0.005), arteriolar hyalinosis (Kendall τ = 0.193, pFDR = 0.018), and total inflammation (Kendall τ = 0.226, pFDR = 0.005). Borderline associations were observed for peritubular capillaritis, transplant glomerulopathy, and inflammation in areas of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (all pFDR = 0.052). No histopathological associations remained significant for anti-PAR1. Both anti-PAR1 and anti-PAR2 concentrations varied with time from transplantation to biopsy, while anti-PAR2 was additionally associated with recipient age at transplantation. Neither antibody was significantly associated with rejection phenotypes. In the exploratory landmark analysis, anti-PAR2 concentrations above the cohort median were associated with a higher hazard of death-censored graft loss (HR = 2.136, 95% CI 1.202-3.795; p = 0.010). Discussion: Higher anti-PAR2 autoantibody concentrations were weakly associated with several chronic histological lesion scores in kidney allograft biopsies. An exploratory landmark analysis showed poorer death-censored graft survival among recipients with anti-PAR2 concentrations above the cohort median, although this association was not significant when anti-PAR2 was analyzed continuously. These findings require prospective validation.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesGraft RejectionKidney TransplantationReceptor, PAR-2AdultFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedReceptor, PAR-1Retrospective StudiesTransplant RecipientsAutoantibodiesReceptor, PAR-1Receptor, PAR-2anti-PAR1 autoantibodiesanti-PAR2 autoantibodieschronic allograft injuryGPCR autoantibodieskidney transplantationnon-HLA antibodies

Identifiers

PMID42694230
PMCPMC13538870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.