ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
TiRobot-assisted cannulated screw fixation for calcaneal fractures: a meta-analysis of surgical trauma, anatomical restoration, and functional recovery.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: TiRobot-assisted cannulated screw fixation may improve surgical precision and clinical outcomes in calcaneal fractures. This meta-analysis evaluated its effects on surgical trauma, anatomical restoration, functional recovery, and complications compared with conventional fixation. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched from inception to April 2026. Comparative studies evaluating TiRobot-assisted versus conventional fixation for calcaneal fractures were included. Pooled mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: Nine studies involving 509 patients were included. Operative time was comparable between groups (MD = -0.75 min). TiRobot-assisted fixation reduced intraoperative blood loss (MD = -28.22 mL) and improved calcaneal anatomical restoration, including calcaneal height (MD = 1.88 mm), Böhler angle (MD = 1.50°), and Gissane angle (MD = 5.00°). Patients treated with TiRobot assistance showed lower postoperative VAS scores (MD = -0.84 points), higher AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores (MD = 4.21 points), and fewer overall complications (OR = 0.17). Conclusions: TiRobot-assisted cannulated screw fixation provides measurable improvements in surgical trauma, anatomical reconstruction, early pain relief, functional recovery, and postoperative safety compared with conventional fixation. Further multicenter randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.