Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694188›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

Integrating reflex, feedback, and prediction: a tiered model of physiological regulation for contemporary medical education.

Changiz Mohiyeddini, Suzan Kamel-ElSayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Changiz MohiyeddiniMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Suzan Kamel-ElSayedDepartment of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical education traditionally presents physiological regulation through homeostatic feedback loops-reactive mechanisms that correct deviations from set points. More recently, allostatic models have emphasized the brain's anticipatory role in regulation. However, presenting these frameworks as competing paradigms creates conceptual confusion for learners. This paper proposes a unified, three-tiered model of physiological regulation that positions reflexive, homeostatic, and predictive mechanisms as complementary systems operating across different timescales. Tier 1 encompasses local reflexive responses providing millisecond-to-second protection. Tier 2 comprises systemic homeostatic feedback maintaining core variables over minutes to hours. Tier 3 involves brain-centered predictive regulation integrating cognition, emotion, and context to anticipate demands. Critically, these tiers interact hierarchically: reflexive mechanisms provide immediate protective boundaries, homeostatic systems coordinate whole-body stability, and predictive processes adjust regulatory set points in anticipation of future needs. In turn, reflexive and homeostatic mechanisms constrain predictive regulation within biological limits. This hierarchical framework provides medical educators with coherent scaffolding for teaching regulation and prepares students to understand how psychological and contextual factors influence health outcomes.

Indexed as

allostasisheart rate variabilityhomeostasismedical educationneurovisceral integrationphysiological regulationpredictive processingpsychophysiology

Identifiers

PMID42694188
PMCPMC13537997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.