Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694169›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

In silico investigation of brain tissue responses associated with mild blast traumatic brain injury.

Tarun Sachdeva, C Jayarami Reddy, S G Ganpule

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tarun SachdevaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.
C Jayarami ReddyDefence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, DRDO, Hyderabad, India.
S G GanpuleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blast induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI) is a significant concern in the era of tactical warfare. The biomechanical response of the human head to blast loading is actively sought. While blast wave propagation through brain tissue is reasonably well understood, the direct relationship between external blast parameters and brain biomechanical responses remains unclear. In this study, a 3D computational human model was used to investigate these relationships under free-field blast conditions relevant to mild bTBI, with peak incident pressure (IOP:70-145 kPa) and positive phase duration (PPD:2-8 ms). The blast wave head interactions were modeled using the conventional weapon (ConWep) technique for a duration of 80 ms. Front and side orientations were considered. The interaction of the blast wave with the human head induced a biomechanical cascade within the brain, which can be broadly categorized into wave propagation and inertial effects. Each of these effects had a peculiar timescale and induced distinct biomechanical signatures. The relationship between external blast parameters and brain biomechanical parameters indicated that brain pressure and the maximum principal strain rate (MPSR) were correlated with peak IOP, whereas equivalent stress and the maximum principal strain (MPS) were correlated with blast impulse. These correlations were specifically governed by the wave propagation and inertial effects, respectively. An increase in PPD had a more deleterious effect than an increase in peak IOP. Brain biomechanical responses produced higher values in the side orientation than in the front orientation, particularly affecting midbrain regions, including the corpus callosum (CC). Brain region specific analysis revealed that pressure was concentrated in the cerebrum (C), whereas equivalent stress and MPS were concentrated in CC. Comparison with blunt TBI suggested similarities in the spatiotemporal evolution of equivalent stress and MPS, but differences in pressure evolution. Overall, these results provide important new insights into the brain's response to the blast and enhance the overall mechanistic understanding of bTBI.

Indexed as

critical brain regionsfinite element analysismild blast traumatic brain injuryprimary blastregional brain biomechanical responses

Identifiers

PMID42694169
PMCPMC13538112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.