Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694165›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in medicine2026

The effect of hawthorn vinegar, black mulberry syrup, and green tea on oral mucositis and oral health-related quality of life in individuals with diabetes: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Hatice Demiraǧ, Zahide Akeren

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06481254 (Effect of Hawthorn Vinegar, Black Mulberry Syrup and Green Tea on Quality of Life Related to Oral Mucositis and Oral Health in Individuals With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06481254 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Hawthorn Vinegar, Black Mulberry Syrup and Green Tea on Quality of Life Related to Oral Mucositis and Oral Health in Individuals With Diabetes: Single Blind Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaradeniz Technical UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsMucositis, Quality of LifeArmsHawthorn Vinegar Group, Black Mulberry Syrup Group, Green Tea Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hatice DemiraǧDepartment of Medical Services and Techniques, Kelkit Sema Doǧan Vocational School of Health Services, Gümüşhane University, Gümüşhane, Türkiye.
Zahide AkerenNursing Department, Health Sciences Faculty, Bayburt University, Bayburt, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed as a single-blind randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of hawthorn vinegar, black mulberry syrup, and green tea on oral mucositis and quality of life related to oral health in individuals with diabetes. Methods: Total of 120 participants were divided into four groups (hawthorn vinegar, black mulberry syrup, green tea, control; Results: Patients in the hawthorn vinegar group showed a decrease in oral mucositis and an increase in oral health-related quality of life at the interim measurement (day 7) and final test (day 14) measurements ( Conclusion: Although there was no difference between hawthorn vinegar and black mulberry syrup, they were found to be more effective than green tea in reducing oral mucositis and improving oral health-related quality of life, and all three complementary treatments were found to be effective. Clinical Trial Registration: identifier [NCT06481254]. https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/beta/studies/S000E5O000000043/recordSummary.

Indexed as

black mulberry syrupGlycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)green teahawthorn vinegarmucositisquality of lifeType 2 Diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42694165
PMCPMC13538107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.