ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Diagnosis and treatment of incarcerated inguinal hernia with "complete reduction": a case report.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reduction en masse (REM) of an incarcerated inguinal hernia is a rare but serious diagnostic pitfall in which apparently successful reduction masks a persistent closed-loop obstruction within the preperitoneal space. Rather than returning to the peritoneal cavity, the hernia sac and its contents are displaced together as a single unit, so the constricting ring continues to compromise the trapped bowel. The result is an occult internal hernia that carries a high risk of bowel strangulation when diagnosis is delayed, yet the deceptively benign external examination frequently leads clinicians to attribute persistent symptoms to other causes. Case presentation: A 70-year-old man presented with small-bowel obstruction 48 hours after forcefully self-reducing a right inguinal hernia. The external bulge had resolved, but obstructive symptoms persisted and progressed. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a pathognomonic "preperitoneal hernia-sac sign": a rounded, obstructed jejunal loop adjacent to the inferior epigastric vessels. Diagnostic laparoscopy confirmed REM, with 10 cm of viable but oedematous small bowel trapped within a direct hernia defect. The constriction was released, a serosal tear was oversewn, and the internal ring was closed. Following conservative management of a postoperative pelvic haematoma, a second-stage open tissue repair was performed one week later. The patient recovered well and remained recurrence free at six-month follow-up. Conclusion: REM should be suspected in any patient with persistent obstructive symptoms after apparent hernia reduction, particularly when there is a history of forceful self-reduction. High-resolution contrast-enhanced CT demonstrating the "preperitoneal hernia-sac sign" is crucial for early diagnosis. Prompt laparoscopic exploration is both diagnostic and therapeutic, enabling assessment of bowel viability, release of the incarceration, and definitive repair while reducing postoperative morbidity. A staged repair strategy is safe and effective in contaminated or oedematous surgical fields. Greater clinician awareness and the systematic consideration of REM in emergency settings can prevent diagnostic delay and its serious consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.