ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Direct visualization of MCM helicase activation and replisome coupling in situ.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deciphering the spatial organization of molecular machines that copy the genome remains a fundamental challenge in biology. Essential for eukaryotic DNA replication, Mini-Chromosome Maintenance (MCM2-7) helicases are loaded during G1 as double hexamers (DHs) to license replication origins. Upon activation in S phase, each DH is thought to split into two single hexamers (SHs) that form the active CMG helicases and travel bidirectionally. However, the field has long been divided: biochemical and structural studies define CMG helicases as autonomous, independent motors, while genomic and cellular imaging assays suggest sister replisomes remain physically coupled within replication factories. Here, we use MINFLUX nanoscopy to localize individual MCM complexes down to nanometer precision in situ, directly resolving DHs in human cells and capturing their separation into SHs upon origin firing. We find that the resulting sister replisomes do not diffuse apart: they remain coupled at a characteristic distance of ~40 nm throughout S phase. Depletion experiments identify two distinct contributions to this coupling: local, protein-mediated tethering by the AND1 scaffold, and higher-order spatial confinement dependent on cohesin, which is dispensable for MCM loading in G1 but required to maintain coupling in S phase. By linking the nanometer-scale architecture of the replisome to the genome-wide topology of replication fountains, these findings provide direct spatial evidence that sister forks are coupled during DNA synthesis and define the molecular forces that organize replisomes within their native nuclear context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.