Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694084›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Direct visualization of MCM helicase activation and replisome coupling in situ.

Oraya J Zinder, Jonas Zähringer, Hana Polasek-Sedlackova, Kannanganattu V Prasanth, Taekjip Ha, Supriya G Prasanth

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oraya J ZinderDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
Jonas ZähringerProgram in Cellular & Molecular Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Hana Polasek-SedlackovaInstitute of Biophysics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Kannanganattu V PrasanthDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
Taekjip HaProgram in Cellular & Molecular Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2195-6258
Supriya G PrasanthDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3735-7498

Funding

Single Molecule Studies of Nucleic Acids RemodelingR35GM122569 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Taekjip Ha · 2017 to 2026
$3.5M
Characterization of nuclear-retained RNA-mediated gene regulatory mechanismsR01GM132458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KANNANGANATTU, PRASANTH KUMAR VIJAYAN · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
Mechanisms of Genome StabilityR35GM152450 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Supriya G Prasanth · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132458NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122569NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM152450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciphering the spatial organization of molecular machines that copy the genome remains a fundamental challenge in biology. Essential for eukaryotic DNA replication, Mini-Chromosome Maintenance (MCM2-7) helicases are loaded during G1 as double hexamers (DHs) to license replication origins. Upon activation in S phase, each DH is thought to split into two single hexamers (SHs) that form the active CMG helicases and travel bidirectionally. However, the field has long been divided: biochemical and structural studies define CMG helicases as autonomous, independent motors, while genomic and cellular imaging assays suggest sister replisomes remain physically coupled within replication factories. Here, we use MINFLUX nanoscopy to localize individual MCM complexes down to nanometer precision in situ, directly resolving DHs in human cells and capturing their separation into SHs upon origin firing. We find that the resulting sister replisomes do not diffuse apart: they remain coupled at a characteristic distance of ~40 nm throughout S phase. Depletion experiments identify two distinct contributions to this coupling: local, protein-mediated tethering by the AND1 scaffold, and higher-order spatial confinement dependent on cohesin, which is dispensable for MCM loading in G1 but required to maintain coupling in S phase. By linking the nanometer-scale architecture of the replisome to the genome-wide topology of replication fountains, these findings provide direct spatial evidence that sister forks are coupled during DNA synthesis and define the molecular forces that organize replisomes within their native nuclear context.

Indexed as

DNA replicationMINFLUX microscopyMinichromosome maintenance proteinsReplisome

Identifiers

PMID42694084
PMCPMC13536934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.