ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026
Return to Golf Rehabilitation Progression after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Evidence-Based Foundation.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Golf is commonly regarded as a low-impact sport, yet the golf swing generates multiplanar loads across both knees. No validated return-to-golf protocol after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been published, and general return-to-sport timelines do not address golf-specific swing volume, club progression, lead- versus trail-knee demands, or return-to-course exposure. Purpose: The purpose of this clinical commentary is to synthesize the available golf-biomechanics and ACLR-rehabilitation evidence and present an evidence-informed, criteria-based progression from putting through unrestricted course play. Study Design: Clinical Commentary/Current Concept Review. Methods: A targeted narrative search of PubMed/MEDLINE and reference lists was performed through June 2026 for literature addressing golf and knee biomechanics, golf-swing modifications, ACLR rehabilitation and return-to-sport criteria, and graft healing. Recommendations were classified as direct golf-biomechanics evidence, indirect ACLR-rehabilitation evidence, or author-consensus guidance when direct evidence was unavailable. Results: No study prospectively evaluated a staged return-to-golf protocol after ACLR. Available evidence indicates that both knees experience meaningful loading throughout the golf swing, with the lead knee subjected to substantial frontal-plane moments and transverse-plane rotational loading during impact and follow-through, while the trail knee also experiences meaningful loading during the backswing and transition. Longer clubs, greater clubhead speed, and larger or faster pressure shifts may increase loading demands across both lower extremities. A six-phase progression is proposed using universal symptom and range-of-motion requirements, objective strength and movement criteria, prescribed swing volumes, lead- and trail-knee considerations, and a separate return-to-course phase. Conclusion: Return to golf after ACLR should be managed as a continuum rather than a single clearance decision. Time from surgery provides a biologic safeguard but should not replace assessment of effusion, pain, motion, gait, strength, movement quality, workload tolerance, and confidence. The proposed protocol is intended to guide clinical decision-making and requires prospective validation. Level of Evidence: 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.