ArticleOpen access journal of sports medicine2026
Sport expertise and visuomotor performance: Evidence from 598 athletes aged 14-39 years.
Article in Open access journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visuomotor functions are critical to athletes' perception, decision-making, and motor execution. This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed 598 athletes (365 male, 233 female; 14-39 years) assessed with a unique combination of standard optometric tests and a digital battery across 10 visuomotor domains. Participants were categorized by competitive level (professional/non-professional) and sport type (strategic/interceptive). A semiparametric Bayesian model examined associations between athlete characteristics and visuomotor scores, and a self-organizing map visualized multivariate profiles. Professionals showed credible advantages in six of ten domains, including depth perception, perception span, reaction time, multiple object tracking, and near-far quickness by both methods. Visual clarity and contrast sensitivity did not differ, and binocular vergence facility and binocular accommodation facility showed small, non-credible differences. Female athletes showed better depth perception and binocular accommodation facility, whereas male athletes performed better in contrast sensitivity and multiple object tracking. Strategic sport athletes outperformed interceptive athletes in multiple object tracking. Multivariate results showed close links between perception span and multiple object tracking and between binocular vergence and binocular accommodation facilities. These findings indicate that higher competitive status is associated with superior dynamic and cognitively demanding visuomotor functions, although the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference. The results support targeted visuomotor profiling in athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.