ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
The perception paradox: experiencing and witnessing skin color discrimination and self-rated health in Latin America.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: An extensive body of literature has established that perceived discrimination is linked to adverse health outcomes. In Latin America, a region deemed a pigmentocracy due to its pronounced skin color-based stratification, research on the relationship between color discrimination and health remains limited and mixed. This ambiguity may reflect a perception paradox in the context of national ideologies of Methods: Using cross-sectional survey data for Brazil, Mexico, Peru, and Colombia from the Project on Ethnicity and Race in Latin America, I examine the relationship between self-rated health and both personal and vicarious color discrimination. Given that national ideologies have historically privileged class-based explanations of stratification while obscuring the role of skin color, I also examine class discrimination as a comparator. Results: The results show that the observed associations between discrimination and health vary by both the target and the attribute of discrimination. While personal color discrimination does not show a statistically significant association with poor health, vicarious color discrimination is robustly associated with poor health. In contrast, personal class discrimination is consistently associated with poor health, while vicarious class discrimination is not. Discussion: Taken together, these findings suggest that associations between perceived discrimination and health must be understood in light of the Latin American racial order in which
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.