Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42694008›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2026

Development and Validation of a Computer-Assisted Screw Trajectory Planning Model Based on Iterative Closest Point Registration and Weighted K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithms for Cortical Bone and Pedicle Screw Techniques.

Abudusalamu Tuoheti, Gufuding, Musitapa Mijiti, Jitao Yang, Hali Habulihan, Awuzhaer Abuliken, Yilixiati Mamuti, Paerhati Rexiti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abudusalamu TuohetiDepartment of Physician Services, Xinjiang International Medical Center (Xinjiang International Hospital, Xinjiang Academy of Medical Sciences), Urumqi, China.ORCID 0009-0008-9315-0177
GufudingDepartment of Orthopedics, The Sixth People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Musitapa MijitiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Jitao YangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Precision Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Hali HabulihanDepartment of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Precision Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Awuzhaer AbulikenDepartment of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Precision Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Yilixiati MamutiDepartment of Physician Services, Xinjiang International Medical Center (Xinjiang International Hospital, Xinjiang Academy of Medical Sciences), Urumqi, China.
Paerhati RexitiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Precision Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5889-0179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective study.ObjectivesTo develop and validate a computer-assisted model for planning screw trajectories to support modified cortical bone trajectory (MCBT), cortical bone trajectory (CBT), and pedicle screw (PS) techniques, based on iterative closest point (ICP) registration and weighted k-nearest neighbors (kNN) algorithms.MethodsCT data from 110 patients undergoing lumbar surgery were analyzed, comprising an internal set of 50 younger patients with normal bone density and an external set of 60 patients including younger and older individuals with or without bone loss. L4-L5 segments were reconstructed using Mimics 21.0. Two surgeons manually planned MCBT, CBT, and PS trajectories bilaterally in the internal set to serve as reference standards. A personalized computer-assisted screw planning model was developed using ICP registration and weighted kNN, where the template library consisted of manually generated screw plans. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing algorithm-generated screw trajectories against expert manually planned trajectories to calculate deviations in sagittal inclination (α), axial inclination (β), screw head, pedicle entry point, pedicle crossing point, and screw tip. Hounsfield unit (HU) values along screw trajectories were also measured.ResultsIn the external set (total of 720 screws: 240 PS, 240 CBT, 240 MCBT), deviations for CBT weresagittal inclination (α) 4.117 (2.028, 7.251)°, axial inclination (β) 3.714 (1.901, 6.316)°, screw head 3.382 (2.514, 4.803) mm, pedicle entry point 3.0 (1.999, 4.149) mm, pedicle crossing point 1.511 (1.008, 2.443) mm, screw tip 3.586 (2.465, 4.542) mm. Those for MCBT were 4.865 (2.126, 7.547)°, 3.801 (1.658, 6.147)°, 4.153 (3.14, 5.658) mm, 3.818 (2.43, 6.209) mm, 1.545 (1.061, 2.222) mm, 3.777 (2.768, 5.241) mm, respectively. Computational acceptance rates for PS were 97.06% (HU: 238.4±67.71) in younger normal bone group, 92.71% (173.6±53.83) in older normal bone group, and 97.37% (113.3±58.68) in older bone loss group. For CBT, rates were 100% (477.2±168.6 HU), 100% (338.5±125.8 HU), and 100% (178.1±99.75 HU), respectively. For MCBT, rates were 100% (475.8±131 HU), 98.96% (376.8±104.9 HU), and 97.37% (213.4±106 HU), respectively. MCBT and CBT achieved significantly higher HU values than PS (P < 0.05).ConclusionThe ICP registration and weighted kNN-based planning model demonstrates high computational acceptance rates and excels in planning cortical bone screw trajectories with low breach rates and high HU values.

Indexed as

automatic planningcortical bone trajectorymachine learningpedicle screw trajectoryspinal instrumentationspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID42694008
PMCPMC13546388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.