ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Revealing subject-specific temporal patterns from longitudinal data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationTemporal multivariate data are ubiquitous in many domains, for instance, being collected over time at planned visits (every few months/years) in longitudinal cohorts, or every few minutes/hours in challenge tests. The analysis of such data often focuses on revealing the underlying temporal patterns common across subjects. However, there are subject-specific differences in temporal patterns, which hold the promise to enhance our understanding of underlying mechanisms and facilitate personalized approaches. Nevertheless, extracting subject-specific temporal patterns from longitudinal multivariate data reliably is an open challenge.
resultsWe introduce coupled matrix factorizations (CMFs) as effective tools to capture subject-specific temporal patterns focusing on two novel applications: analysis of longitudinal metabolomics data and sensitization data. Our analysis shows that CMF models reliably capture subject-specific (shape) differences in temporal patterns with the promise to reveal further insights compared to the state of the art. In metabolomics, CMF models reveal differences in metabolic responses of individuals (in a postprandial meal challenge) according to anthropometric and insulin sensitivity measures. In sensitization data analysis, CMF-based methods capture differences in temporal trajectories of children according to delivery/birth mode and atopic disease diagnosis. We demonstrate the reliability of extracted patterns using reproducibility and replicability. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code is available on github.com/cchatzis/Revealing-Subject-specific-Temporal-Patterns-from-Longitudinal-Data and doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22084338. Clinical data are not publicly available due to privacy reasons. Data can be made available under a joint research collaboration by contacting COPSAC (administration@dbac.dk).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.