Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42693914›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2026

A dynamic recovery failure index after acute type A aortic dissection surgery.

Shuaishuai Yuan, Lingling Li, Minxin Wei, Zanxin Wang, Rui Zhang, Yue Ma, Zijian Wang, Chao Tao, Zenan Zhou, Xiantao Liu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Shuaishuai YuanDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Lingling LiShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Minxin WeiDivision of Cardiovascular and Vascular Surgery, Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Zanxin WangDivision of Cardiovascular and Vascular Surgery, Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Rui ZhangDivision of Cardiovascular and Vascular Surgery, Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Yue MaDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Zijian WangDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Chao TaoDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Zenan ZhouDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Xiantao LiuDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Yi LuDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Qi AnDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Fengqing LiuDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Guiqiong FuDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Rongfeng YangDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.
Peijun LiDivision of Cardiovascular Intensive Care (C-ICU), Cardiac and Vascular Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is associated with a high risk of postoperative severe organ dysfunction. Preoperative risk scores alone may not capture early postoperative pathophysiological recovery. This study aimed to develop and temporally validate a dynamic inflammation-perfusion-coagulation recovery failure index (dIPC-RFI), based on routinely available preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 24-hour postoperative laboratory and blood gas variables, for risk restratification of severe organ dysfunction beyond 24 h after ATAAD surgery.

methodsPatients with ATAAD who underwent emergency surgical repair at The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital between August 2021 and December 2025 were retrospectively included. Postoperative 24 h was used as the fixed risk-assessment starting point; only patients who were alive, free from the primary outcome, and had complete variables required for dIPC-RFI assessment at 24 h were included. Patients were split chronologically into a derivation cohort (first 70%) and a temporal validation cohort (last 30%). The primary outcome was severe organ dysfunction occurring after 24 h until discharge or within 30 days, defined as any of the following: continuous renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation for ≥72 h, neurological complications, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, in-hospital death after 24 h or 30-day death, intra-aortic balloon pump support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or tracheostomy. dIPC-RFI consisted of three domains-inflammation, perfusion, and coagulation-each including one static 24-hour variable and one dynamic change variable. Cutoffs were derived using receiver operating characteristic curves and the Youden index in the derivation cohort and then fixed for the validation cohort. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, calibration curve, calibration intercept and slope, and decision curve analysis.

resultsA total of 330 patients were included, of whom 134 (40.6%) developed severe organ dysfunction after 24 h. Event rates were 39.0% in the derivation cohort and 44.4% in the temporal validation cohort (

conclusionsdIPC-RFI provides a simple 24-hour postoperative framework for identifying incomplete recovery across inflammation, perfusion, and coagulation after ATAAD surgery. It may help ICU teams identify patients who require intensified monitoring, repeated lactate and coagulation assessment, early multidisciplinary review, and preparation for organ support. dIPC-RFI should be used as a risk-restratification aid rather than a stand-alone treatment trigger, and prospective multicenter validation is required before routine implementation.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionDissection, Ascending AortaMultiple Organ FailurePostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAcute type A aortic dissectioncoagulationinflammationlactate clearanceperfusionplatelet declinerisk restratificationsevere organ dysfunctiontemporal validation

Identifiers

PMID42693914
PMCPMC13552331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.