Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42693796›Full record

ReviewThe Biochemical journal2026

Graph-based representations in modern protein science.

Dana S Matthews, Sacha B Pulsford, Anthony Barancewicz, John Z Chen, Barnabas Gall, Mahakaran Sandhu, Matthew A Spence, Colin J Jackson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Biochemical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dana S Matthews *Research School of Chemistry, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-7283-4884
Sacha B Pulsford *Research School of Chemistry, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9179-9214
Anthony BarancewiczARC Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide & Protein Science, Research School of Chemistry, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-1081-4298
John Z ChenResearch School of Chemistry, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2628-5820
Barnabas GallResearch School of Chemistry, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-3182-9911
Mahakaran SandhuResearch School of Chemistry, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Matthew A SpenceARC Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide & Protein Science, Research School of Chemistry, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2284-2498
Colin J JacksonResearch School of Chemistry, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6150-3822

Funding

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 50 years, the linear sequence and the multiple sequence alignment have been the foundational data structures of protein science, and they remain central to homology search, phylogenetic inference, covariance-based contact prediction, and modern protein language models. However, relational and graph-based representations are increasingly being adopted alongside sequence-based methods to capture biological relationships that linear data structures express only implicitly. Proteins fold as three-dimensional residue interaction networks, evolve through high-dimensional genotype networks defined by mutational connectivity, and operate within cellular protein-protein interaction graphs. Here, we review how graph theory is being used to describe and understand these relationships across protein science, with an emphasis on what these methods offer biochemists working on enzyme superfamilies, protein engineering, drug targets, and functional annotation. We trace the development of these ideas from early theoretical topologies, through statistical coupling and the structural network analyses, to the geometric and graph-like representations used in recent machine-learning-driven advances. Throughout, we emphasise that graphs do not replace sequences or MSAs but provide a complementary representation for biochemical relationships that are difficult to express in one dimension.

Indexed as

ProteinsHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsprotein evolutionprotein-protein interactionsprotein structure

Identifiers

PMID42693796
PMCPMC13543026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.