ArticleMedical physics2026
Anatomy-aware fusion attention network for high-precision prostate MRI segmentation.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate prostate segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, it remains a challenging task due to low soft-tissue contrast and structural ambiguity in the gland's appearance. While recent deep learning methods have focused on refining network structures, they often neglect the inherent anatomical consistency of the prostate. PURPOSE: To address this limitation, a novel segmentation framework integrating an Anatomy-Aware Fusion Attention (AAFA) module is proposed.
methodsBy leveraging anatomical templates, our approach establishes a multilevel feature cross-attention mechanism that enhances global contextual modeling of prostate regions. Additionally, we introduce a Phased Learning strategy that progressively trains the model to mitigate the adverse effects of invalid or noisy samples commonly found in clinical MRI data.
resultsExtensive ablation studies on the PROMISE12 dataset validate the contribution of each component to overall performance. Comparison experiments on both PROMISE12 and MSD Prostate datasets show that our method consistently outperforms existing approaches across key metrics, such as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), Precision and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95).
conclusionsThese results confirm the robustness and strong generalization capability of the proposed framework in challenging clinical segmentation tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.