ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2026
Racial disparities in multiple sclerosis quality of care metrics.
Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundModifiable factors that contribute to racial disparities in healthcare have been highlighted in multiple clinical settings; however, the role of these factors in individuals with multiple sclerosis has not been well examined.
objectivesIn this study, we quantify disparities in multiple sclerosis care among non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients.
methodsLongitudinal data across four encounters obtained via retrospective chart review were analyzed for non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients across two multiple sclerosis centers. Variables included demographics, multiple sclerosis characteristics, and clinical care factors.
resultsIn total, 150 non-Hispanic Black and 150 non-Hispanic White patients were included (mean age = 49.3 vs 53.6). Non-Hispanic Black patients had longer time gaps between encounters with their multiple sclerosis clinician versus non-Hispanic White (mean months = 10.3 vs 8.8; adjusted mean difference = 1.53 months (95% confidence interval = 0.59, 2.47;
conclusionsGaps in multiple sclerosis care metrics, including lower levels of care and greater time between encounters, were observed for non-Hispanic Black compared to non-Hispanic White patients with multiple sclerosis, all of which may contribute to disparities in multiple sclerosis. Further research is needed to assess contributing clinician, patient, and systemic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.