SynthesisMuscle & nerve2026
Risk Factors for Exercise-Associated Muscle Cramps: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsExercise-associated muscle cramps (EAMC) are common in athletic populations and are frequently cited as a factor limiting performance. Despite extensive investigation, uncertainty remains regarding the risk factors associated with EAMC. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to identify and synthesize the available evidence on potential risk factors for EAMC.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL from inception to April 2026. Longitudinal studies that followed participants over any period to assess the occurrence of EAMC were included.
resultsOf 14,181 records, nine studies were included (n = 11,274 participants). Across 36 meta-analyses, only three variables demonstrated statistically significant associations with EAMC. A prior history of EAMC was associated with subsequent episodes, conferring approximately 4.4-fold higher odds of EAMC occurrence (strong evidence). Higher post-race serum potassium (moderate evidence) and magnesium (limited evidence) concentrations were also observed in individuals with EAMC. Strong evidence indicated no associations between EAMC and age, body mass, or height. No other consistent results were identified across anthropometric, demographic, hydration, metabolic, performance, practice, routine, or training domains. DISCUSSION: The association with prior EAMC history supports the concept of a recurrent phenomenon. This suggests that EAMC may be driven primarily by individual history rather than by commonly investigated physiological or training-related factors. The uncertainties regarding hydration status, electrolyte balance, training load, and performance challenge traditional preventive paradigms. However, given that most findings were supported by limited or very limited evidence, further high-quality research is warranted.
trial registrationPROSPERO: CRD420251061240.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.