Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42693627›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2026

Exploring EEG and ECG in Music Listening: A Scoping Review.

Scott R Leimroth, Robert J Barry, Frances M De Blasio, Timothy P Byron

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott R LeimrothBrain & Behaviour Research Institute and School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3617-7994
Robert J BarryBrain & Behaviour Research Institute and School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2734-9475
Frances M De BlasioBrain & Behaviour Research Institute and School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1442-9820
Timothy P ByronBrain & Behaviour Research Institute and School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7149-4421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music listening, a common daily activity recognized for its emotional impact and ability to evoke memories, engages physiological and psychological processes. Concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) during music listening can inform our understanding of these processes. However, the insights offered by such simultaneous recordings, and the extent to which existing studies align with published methodological guidelines, remain unclear. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed research examining physiological responses to passive music listening using combined EEG and ECG measures in healthy adult non-musicians. A structured search of five databases identified 18 papers. Data on methods, participant demographics, musical stimuli, and EEG/ECG measures were extracted and compared against established guidelines to clarify the studies' methodological rigor. EEG findings were highly heterogeneous, spanning spectral power, lateralized effects, and event-related potentials, with limited overlap in analytical focus. Cardiac outcomes were similarly mixed, with studies reporting increases, decreases, or no change in heart rate depending on stimulus and context. Only a small subset of studies examined brain-heart coupling directly, with preliminary evidence of synchronization between neural and cardiac rhythms during music listening, leaving the central question of how brain and heart respond together to music largely open. Our review identified significant methodological inconsistencies and a lack of integration between the two measures, highlighting the challenges of this interdisciplinary research. Advancing research in both music and psychophysiology requires improving alignment between methodologies from these distinct areas by following established standards. These findings highlight a critical need for greater methodological standardization to build a more reliable and replicable understanding of music's psychophysiological effects.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionBrainElectrocardiographyElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHeart RateMusicHumansECGEEGguidelinesmethodologymusic listeningscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42693627
PMCPMC13542476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.