ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2026
Impact of Neoadjuvant Approach and Tumor Response on Survival in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: Precision Robotic Anatomical Segmentectomy 8 Using a Hepatic Vein-Guided and Image-Guided Approach.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNeoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has evolved from single-agent to multi-agent approaches, largely informed by metastatic disease studies demonstrating improved survival; albeit at the price of increased toxicity. It remains unclear how response to varied neoadjuvant regimens impact survival. We hypothesized that tumor response to different neoadjuvant approaches reflects underlying tumor biology, and achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) with single-agent neoadjuvant may signal favorable biology.
methodsAdult PDAC patients (2010-2021) who received neoadjuvant therapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Tumor response was categorized as pCR (pT0N0), moderate (≥ 2 T-stage reduction), or minimal/no response (≤ 1 T-stage reduction). Patients with stage IV disease, margin positive, or nodal involvement on final pathology were excluded; sensitivity analyses including these patients were performed. Neoadjuvant regimens were classified as single-agent, multi-agent, or multi-agent therapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy.
resultsOf 1923 patients, 9.8% achieved pCR, 19.1% had moderate response and 71.1% had minimal/no response. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 74% [68-81] for pCR, 56% [51-62] for moderate, and 50% [47-52] for minimal/no response. Notably, 11% of pCR patients received single-agent therapy and had a 3-year OS comparable to those who received more intensive regimens, even after adjusting for confounders. Conversely, single-agent therapy in moderate or minimal/no responders was associated with significantly worse survival. Sensitivity analyses including patients with nodal metastasis and positive margins demonstrated consistent trends.
conclusionsMost PDAC patients benefit from multi-agent neoadjuvant, although a small subset achieve pCR with single-agent therapy and experience excellent outcomes. Response to varied neoadjuvant approaches merits further investigation in biomarker-driven studies and may inform opportunities for therapy personalization in appropriately selected PDAC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.