ArticlePsychophysiology2026
Working Memory Load Reduces the Electrocortical Processing of Negative Pictures but Accentuates Their Processing at Subsequent Viewing.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive load can reduce attention to negative stimuli, but its utility as an emotion regulation strategy may depend on whether it functions like avoidance, leading to short-term reductions in stimulus salience that nonetheless preserve or even heighten response to stimuli at subsequent encounters. Here, 73 participants performed a working memory task interspersed with negative and neutral pictures, prior to viewing the same pictures again alongside new negative and neutral pictures in a surprise recognition task. During the first task, working memory load reduced picture processing, replicating prior findings. During the second task, negative pictures that had previously been presented under high-load and new negative pictures were processed similarly, receiving more attentional resources than negative pictures that had been presented under low-load. Subjective picture ratings showed similar results, with negative pictures that had previously been presented under high-load rated as more arousing than those that had been presented under low-load, and indistinguishable from new negative pictures. Negative pictures that had previously been presented on high-load compared to low-load trials also had lower recognition accuracy. The overall direction of effects differed for neutral compared to negative pictures, but pictures that had been presented under high working memory resembled new pictures in the responses they elicited across both picture types. For negative stimuli, results suggest a mechanism through which disengaged emotion regulation strategies may fail to attenuate and may even increase emotional responses to stimuli when encountered again outside of the initial regulation context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.