Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42693564›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2026

Magnetically Driven Biofabrication for Tissue Engineering: From Nanoparticle Design to Mag-ATMP Translation.

Konstantinos Ioannidis, Dimitrios Lefas, Maya Guilliams, Jackie Van Grootenbril, Isaak Decoene, Dimitrios Sakellariou, Bart Smeets, Stefanos Mourdikoudis, Ioannis Papantoniou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Konstantinos IoannidisPrometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1800-534X
Dimitrios LefasPrometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7400-432X
Maya GuilliamsPrometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7752-8608
Jackie Van GrootenbrilPrometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8636-7293
Isaak DecoenePrometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2541-8983
Dimitrios SakellariouMembrane Separations, Adsorption, Catalysis, and Spectroscopy for Sustainable Solutions (cMACS), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7424-5543
Bart SmeetsPrometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8753-781X
Stefanos MourdikoudisDepartment of Physical Chemistry, CINBIO, Materials Chemistry and Physics Group, Universidade De Vigo, Vigo, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7187-5128
Ioannis PapantoniouPrometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4754-5492

Funding

KU Leuven Research Council (Onderzoeksraad KU Leuven) C24M/22/058KU Leuven Research Council (Onderzoeksraad KU Leuven) ID-N/3M230283Research Foundation - Flanders (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; FWO) 1SA4426NResearch Foundation - Flanders (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; FWO) 1SD7225NResearch Foundation - Flanders (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; FWO) G042425N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetically driven biofabrication is emerging as a materials-enabled extension of tissue engineering, integrating advances in magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) design with cells, spheroids, and biomaterial scaffolds to engineer responsive and remotely controllable living systems. Progress in nanoparticle engineering has yielded biocompatible and tunable MNP formulations that can be incorporated into hydrogels, spheroids, organoids, and scaffolds, where they influence cellular behavior, extracellular matrix organization, and mechanotransduction. Externally applied magnetic fields further enable non-contact control over cell positioning, microtissue assembly, matrix alignment, and dynamic mechanical stimulation, expanding the design space of 3D and 4D biofabrication. This Review critically maps and unifies the multiscale design principles underlying magnetically driven biofabrication, spanning nanoparticle design, magnetic actuation strategies, and biological responses. We compare approaches ranging from single-cell manipulation and magnetoactive bioinks to spheroid fusion and microfluidic systems with embedded magnetic actuation. We further discuss how physics-based modeling, data-informed optimization, and emerging digital twin concepts may help connect material properties, magnetic field design, and biological response. Finally, we examine translational considerations, including Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-compatible nanoparticle formulations, mechanistic clarity, long-term safety evaluation, and regulatory alignment, converging toward magnetically enabled tissue-engineered advanced therapy medicinal products (Mag-TE ATMPs).

Indexed as

Magnetite NanoparticlesNanoparticlesTissue EngineeringAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansMagnetic FieldsMagneticsTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsMagnetite Nanoparticles4D biofabricationartificial intelligencedigital twinsmagnetically driven biofabricationmagnetoactive biomaterialstissue‐engineered ATMPs

Identifiers

PMID42693564
PMCPMC13612929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.