ArticleBMC health services research2026
Tiered diagnosis and value-based healthcare: can the outpatient reimbursement policy for medical costs in retail pharmacies promote both?
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAmid growing health demands and tight welfare budgets, guiding rational healthcare-seeking behavior to improve health while controlling costs has become a global challenge. This study aims to examine whether the reform of medical insurance on the cost-sharing of pharmacy can promote tiered diagnosis and value-based healthcare.
methodsUsing 2011-2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study data and the Staggered DID method, this paper estimates the effects of the Retail Pharmacies Outpatient Reimbursement (RPOR) reform in the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI).
resultsThe RPOR indeed promoted the pharmacy visits (0.119) and the proportion of its expenditures in the total medical expenses (0.439**). However, its crowding-out of lower-level outpatient services (-0.670***) may pose certain obstacles to the tiered diagnosis system. Although the reform controlled the increase of total health expenditure (-0.490**) and adjusted the structure of medical expenditures, its effect on health improvement and value-based healthcare still needs to be realized. The above effects vary with policy design, regional resources, as well as individuals' age and income.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that while the cost-sharing reform effectively controls total expenditures, the resulting substitution of primary care with pharmacy services and its limitation on health gains call for a more effective policy design to achieve tiered diagnosis and value-based healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.